<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Designated Daughter &#187; words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designateddaughter.com/tag/words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designateddaughter.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 05:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Katherine Jackson’s shocking change of heart</title>
		<link>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/katherine-jackson%e2%80%99s-shocking-change-of-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/katherine-jackson%e2%80%99s-shocking-change-of-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle B. Mayoras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aging Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caregiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designated daughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katherine-jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael-jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/katherine-jackson%e2%80%99s-shocking-change-of-heart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Michael Jackson Estate has been the subject of regular court hearings as Katherine Jackson battled for control over the last several months.  She routinely objected to the decisions of the co-executors John Branca and John McClain.  Recently, she hired a new attorney with the promise of taking the case in a new direction, as I discussed in this recent article about the Michael Jackson case . Her case took a new direction, all right.  She decided to drop her claim.  That&#8217;s right, she stopped fighting and agreed to let the executors run the show without her. Surprised?  I was.  And I was far from the only one.  Here&#8217;s what a lawyer in the case said about Katherine Jackson&#8217;s change of heart, according to CNN: &#8220;She has now reneged on her obligation to her family.&#8221;  This same lawyer then said that it was &#8220;one of the most despicable displays&#8221; he&#8217;d ever seen in court.  He even accused Katherine of colluding with the estate executors in a &#8220;secret deal&#8221;. So who was this attorney representing?  None other than Joe Jackson &#8212; Katherine&#8217;s husband of 60 years.  Granted, they don&#8217;t live together, but obviously, he was taken aback about what happened. And Joe and his attorney didn&#8217;t take it lying down.  In fact, they filed their own petition to remove the executors, claiming they had a conflict of interest and failed to disclose to the court that Michael Jackson was in New York the date the will was signed, calling into question whether it is even valid. But the judge ruled that Joe Jackson didn&#8217;t have legal &#8220;standing&#8221; to make that claim because he wasn&#8217;t a beneficiary.  In other words, he had no horse in the race, so to speak, so he wasn&#8217;t allowed to try to remove the executors.  The only ones who can do so are Katherine Jackson, the three children (who are minors &#8212; and they act through their guardian, Katherine), or the unnamed charities that so far have not been publicly revealed. So, at this point, unless Katherine Jackson has another change of heart, or unless another beneficiary comes forward, the legal fighting may be at an end &#8230; at least in this court.  Joe Jackson&#8217;s attorney has promised to appeal the verdict and try his luck in another court. He did get one bit of good news.  The judge allowed him to proceed with his request for a monthly allowance from the Michael Jackson Estate in the amount of $20,000/month.  The judge hasn&#8217;t agreed to give him that yet, but at least he has the right to file a request for it. Perhaps trying to pacify her now-angry husband, Katherine Jackson reportedly said she won&#8217;t contest his request for an allowance. Wow this is getting interesting!  And I have a feeling we haven&#8217;t heard the last of this issue.  But, we&#8217;ll have to wait and see. The Michael Jackson case shows how important the proper estate planning is for everyone.  The better your legal planning, the less likely you&#8217;re family will fight over your money when you&#8217;re gone.  So don&#8217;t delay; go see a good estate planning attorney now.  Or your family may end up hiring probate litigation attorneys later. And if you have a loved one in your family who doesn&#8217;t want to do estate planning, and you need help convincing him or her, here&#8217;s something that may help . Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial &#038; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights! and co-founder and shareholder of The Center for Probate Litigation and The Center for Elder Law in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at blog @ trialandheirs.com. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fkatherine-jackson%25e2%2580%2599s-shocking-change-of-heart%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fkatherine-jackson%25e2%2580%2599s-shocking-change-of-heart%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0px initial initial;" title="Michael Jackson Trial and Heirs" src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/b09ea_6a01053645c43a970b0120a684b99b970b-800wi" border="0" alt="Michael Jackson Trial and Heirs" width="150" height="212" /></p>
<p>The Michael Jackson Estate has been the subject of regular court hearings as Katherine Jackson battled for control over the last several months.  She routinely objected to the decisions of the co-executors John Branca and John McClain.  Recently, she hired a new attorney with the promise of taking the case in a new direction, as I discussed in this recent article about the Michael Jackson case .</p>
<p>Her case took a new direction, all right.  She decided to drop her claim.  That’s right, she stopped fighting and agreed to let the executors run the show without her. Surprised?  I was.  And I was far from the only one.  Here’s what a lawyer in the case said about Katherine Jackson’s change of heart, according to CNN: “She has now reneged on her obligation to her family.”  This same lawyer then said that it was “one of the most despicable displays” he’d ever seen in court.  He even accused Katherine of colluding with the estate executors in a “secret deal”. So who was this attorney representing?  None other than Joe Jackson — Katherine’s husband of 60 years.  Granted, they don’t live together, but obviously, he was taken aback about what happened. And Joe and his attorney</p>
<p><strong>Read rest at: </strong><a title="Katherine Jackson’s shocking change of heart" href="http://www.trialandheirs.com/?p=381" target="_blank"><strong>Katherine Jackson’s shocking change of heart</strong></a></p>
<div>
<p><span><span><em>Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of <a href="http://www.trialandheirs.com/" target="_blank">Trial &amp; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!</a> and co-founder and shareholder of </em><em><a href="http://probatelitigationmi.com/" target="_blank">The Center for Probate Litigation</a></em><em> and </em><em><a href="http://www.thecenterforelderlaw.com/" target="_blank">The Center for Elder Law</a> </em><em>in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at blog @ trialandheirs.com.</em></span></span></div>
<div></div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fkatherine-jackson%25e2%2580%2599s-shocking-change-of-heart%2F&amp;linkname=Katherine%20Jackson%E2%80%99s%20shocking%20change%20of%20heart"><img src="http://www.designateddaughter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/katherine-jackson%e2%80%99s-shocking-change-of-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ike Turner Will Contest Ruling is in</title>
		<link>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/ike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/ike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mayoras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aging Parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caregiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designated daughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous-fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/ike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The trial involving whether Rock &#8216;n Roll pioneer &#038; legend, Ike Turner, left a valid will has ended.  As described in this prior article I wrote, the case pitted his six children (two of whom apparently are now questionable children of his) versus his ex-wife versus his friend and &#8220;sometime&#8221; attorney.  I&#8217;m not exactly sure why someone would be a &#8220;sometime&#8221; attorney, but that&#8217;s how he was described in this North County Times (California) article about the trial. The children argued Ike died without a valid will, leaving all to them under California&#8217;s intestate laws.  The ex-wife, Audrey Madison Turner, felt that Ike had left everything to her through a handwritten will written two months before he died of a drug overdose in 2007 (even though the couple was already divorced). The &#8220;sometime&#8221; attorney believed a prior handwritten will in 2001 left him in control of Ike&#8217;s legacy.  What was that legacy?  While it appeared the estate was cash-poor, the victor would receive the rights to own and profit from some 4000 songs.  That&#8217;s a lot of notes! A few days ago, the judge issued his decision.  He ruled that both wills may have been valid, but a later note written by Ike Turner had revoked the last will, which in turn had revoked the 2001 will.  This meant the children were the big winners . . . at least so far. The judge also granted all of the combatants a chance to appear in front of him again to try to change his mind.  This is a rare step, especially given his first ruling came through a 16-page decision, issued two weeks after the trial ended.  In other words, this was far from a snap decision, which means the likelihood of him changing his mind would be minimal. So, while we can&#8217;t declare a final winner yet, the children surely had a good time celebrating this Halloween weekend.  Of course, regardless of what happens after the next court hearing, there is likely to be an appeal.  The losing side almost always appeals after trials like these.  There are too many emotions at stake (not to mention dollars) to go away quietly. Too bad Ike wasn&#8217;t better about documenting his wishes and avoiding a family fight.  For some reason, court fights among heirs to famous musicians are common.  Just ask the families of Michael Jackson, James Brown, Ray Charles, Jimi Hendrix, Jerry Garcia, and Whitney Houston (wait &#8212; she&#8217;s not dead yet, but she is involved in a fight over what her late father&#8217;s true wishes were). All of these stories, and many more, are covered in the new book Trial &#038; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!, co-written by Andrew &#038; Danielle Mayoras.  We use these stories to help make sure your family won&#8217;t end up the same way.  We also teach you what to do (and not do) if you&#8217;re already in a fight. It&#8217;s available at TrialAndHeirs.com . Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial &#038; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights! and co-founder and shareholder of The Center for Probate Litigation and The Center for Elder Law in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at blog @ trialandheirs.com. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>The trial involving whether Rock ‘n Roll pioneer &amp; legend, Ike Turner, left a valid will has ended.  As described in this prior article I wrote, the case pitted his six children (two of whom apparently are now questionable children of his) versus his ex-wife versus his friend and “sometime” attorney.  I’m not exactly sure why someone would be a “sometime” attorney, but that’s how he was described in this North County Times (California) article about the trial. The children argued Ike died without a valid will, leaving all to them under California’s intestate laws.  The ex-wife, Audrey Madison Turner, felt that Ike had left everything to her through a handwritten will written two months before he died of a drug overdose in 2007 (even though the couple was already divorced). The “sometime” attorney believed a prior handwritten will in 2001 left him in control of Ike’s legacy.  What was that legacy?  While it appeared the estate was cash-poor, the victor would receive the rights to own and profit from some 4000 songs.  That’s a lot of notes! A few days ago, the judge issued his decision.  He ruled that both wills may have been valid, but a later note written by Ike Turner had revoked the last will, which in turn had revoked the 2001 will.  This meant the children were the big winners . . . at least so far. The judge also granted all of the combatants a chance to appear in front of him again to try to change his mind.  This is a rare step, especially given his first ruling came through a 16-page decision, issued two weeks after the trial ended.  In other words, this was far from a snap decision, which means the likelihood of him changing his mind would be minimal. So, while we can’t declare a final winner yet, the children surely had a good time celebrating this Halloween weekend.  Of course, regardless of what happens after the next court hearing, there is likely to be an appeal.  The losing side almost always appeals after trials like these.  There are too many emotions at stake (not to mention dollars) to go away quietly. Too bad Ike wasn’t better about documenting his wishes and avoiding a family fight.  For some reason, court fights among heirs to famous musicians are common.  Just ask the families of Michael Jackson, James Brown, Ray Charles, Jimi Hendrix, Jerry Garcia, and Whitney Houston (wait — she’s not dead yet, but she is involved in a fight over what her late father’s true wishes were). All of these stories, and many more, are covered in the new book Trial &amp; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!, co-written by Andrew &amp; Danielle Mayoras.  We use these stories to help make sure your family won’t end up the same way.  We also teach you what to do (and not do) if you’re already in a fight. It’s available at TrialAndHeirs.com . Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial &amp; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights! and co-founder and shareholder of The Center for Probate Litigation and The Center for Elder Law in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at blog @ trialandheirs.com.</p>
<div>
<p>The trial involving whether Rock ‘n Roll pioneer &amp; legend, Ike Turner, left a valid will has ended.  As described in <a href="http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/2009/09/ike-turner-estate-starts-a-very-ugly-trial.html#more" target="_blank">this prior article</a> I wrote, the case pitted his six children (two of whom apparently are now questionable children of his) versus his ex-wife versus his friend and “sometime” attorney.  I’m not exactly sure why someone would be a “sometime” attorney, but that’s how he was described in this <a href="http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_cac69256-dc39-5860-b32f-3bc665874781.html" target="_blank">North County Times</a> (California) article about the trial.</p>
<p><a href="http://probatelitigation.typepad.com/.a/6a01053645c43a970b0120a648aca3970b-pi"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/23043_6a01053645c43a970b0120a648aca3970b-150wi" alt="IkeTurner" /></a> <a href="http://probatelitigation.typepad.com/.a/6a01053645c43a970b0120a69e27a9970c-pi"></a></p>
<p>The children argued Ike died without a valid will, leaving all to them under California’s intestate laws.  The ex-wife, Audrey Madison Turner, felt that Ike had left everything to her through a handwritten will written two months before he died of a drug overdose in 2007 (even though the couple was already divorced).</p>
<p>The “sometime” attorney believed a prior handwritten will in 2001 left him in control of Ike’s legacy.  What was that legacy?  While it appeared the estate was cash-poor, the victor would receive the rights to own and profit from some 4000 songs.  That’s a lot of notes!</p>
<p>A few days ago, the judge issued his decision.  He ruled that both wills may have been valid, but a later note written by Ike Turner had revoked the last will, which in turn had revoked the 2001 will.  This meant the children were the big winners . . . at least so far.</p>
<p>The judge also granted all of the combatants a chance to appear in front of him again to try to change his mind.  This is a rare step, especially given his first ruling came through a 16-page decision, issued two weeks after the trial ended.  In other words, this was far from a snap decision, which means the likelihood of him changing his mind would be minimal.</p>
<p>So, while we can’t declare a final winner yet, the children surely had a good time celebrating this Halloween weekend.  Of course, regardless of what happens after the next court hearing, there is likely to be an appeal.  The losing side almost always appeals after trials like these.  There are too many emotions at stake (not to mention dollars) to go away quietly.</p>
<p>Too bad Ike wasn’t better about documenting his wishes and avoiding a family fight.  For some reason, court fights among heirs to famous musicians are common.  Just ask the families of Michael Jackson, James Brown, Ray Charles, Jimi Hendrix, Jerry Garcia, and Whitney Houston (wait — she’s not dead yet, but she is involved in a fight over what her late father’s true wishes were).</p>
<p>All of these stories, and many more, are covered in the new book Trial &amp; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!, co-written by Andrew &amp; Danielle Mayoras.  We use these stories to help make sure your family won’t end up the same way.  We also teach you what to do (and not do) if you’re already in a fight.</p>
<p>It’s available at <a href="http://www.trialandheirs.com/?page_id=235" target="_blank">TrialAndHeirs.com</a>.</p>
<p><span><span><em>Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of <a href="http://www.trialandheirs.com/" target="_blank">Trial &amp; Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!</a> and co-founder and shareholder of </em><em><a href="http://probatelitigationmi.com/" target="_blank">The Center for Probate Litigation</a></em><em> and </em><em><a href="http://www.thecenterforelderlaw.com/" target="_blank">The Center for Elder Law</a> </em><em>in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at blog @ trialandheirs.com.</em></span></span></div>
<div><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProbateLawyerBlog?a=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/23043_ProbateLawyerBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProbateLawyerBlog?a=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/23043_ProbateLawyerBlog?i=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProbateLawyerBlog?a=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/229fa_ProbateLawyerBlog?i=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProbateLawyerBlog?a=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/229fa_ProbateLawyerBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ProbateLawyerBlog?a=FVD-OiBjGik:WCV0p0sor88:I9og5sOYxJI"><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/229fa_ProbateLawyerBlog?d=I9og5sOYxJI" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p><img src="http://www.trialandheirs.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/229fa_FVD-OiBjGik" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a title="Ike Turner Will Contest Ruling is in" href="http://www.trialandheirs.com/?p=316" target="_blank">Ike Turner Will Contest Ruling is in</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designateddaughter.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in%2F&amp;linkname=Ike%20Turner%20Will%20Contest%20Ruling%20is%20in"><img src="http://www.designateddaughter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designateddaughter.com/2009/11/ike-turner-will-contest-ruling-is-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

